Pembelajaran Kimia: Bagaimana Model Pembelajaran Kimia Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa

Agustina Simorangkir

doi:10.31605/saintifik.v10i2.609

Agustina Simorangkir Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31605/saintifik.v10i2.609

Keywords: Kesetimbangan Kimia, Pembelajaran Kimia, Problem Based Learning (PBL), Prestasi Belajar Siswa

Abstract

Alasan mengapa pembelajaran kimia dianggap sulit oleh siswa karena sifatnya yang abstrak, kompleks, dan menuntut pemahaman konseptual yang mendalam. Peningkatan prestasi akademik siswa dapat dicapai dengan mengimplementasikan model pembelajaran yang efektif, seperti Problem Based Learning (PBL). Fokus utama penelitian ini adalah kesetimbangan kimia, disertai analisis efektivitas model pembelajaran kimia, seperti Problem Based Learning (PBL), terhadap peningkatan capaian belajar. Dengan penerapan model yang sesuai, siswa tidak hanya lebih memahami konsep-konsep kimia, tetapi juga menunjukkan peningkatan dalam prestasi belajar mereka. Kajian ini menegaskan bahwa transformasi dalam strategi pembelajaran sangat berpengaruh terhadap peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran kimia di sekolah. Hasil penelitian ini memperlihatkan peningkatan yang substansial pada capaian belajar siswa pasca-implementasi model Problem Based Learning (PBL). Penelitian ini menyajikan informasi berharga bagi para pengajar yang mempertimbangkan PBL di kelas kimia. Diharapkan bahwa implementasi ini akan berfungsi sebagai strategi efektif dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar, memperdalam pemahaman kimia siswa, serta mendorong minat berkelanjutan mereka terhadap mata pelajaran tersebut.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, S., Mudzakir, A., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2023). How to calculate paired sample ttest using spss software: from step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of the effect of application anti-fire bamboo teaching materials on student learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 2(1),81-92. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis. v2il.45895

Aidoo, B., Boateng, S. K., Kissi, P. S., & Ofori, I. (2016). Effect of Problem Based Learning on Students‘ Achievement in Chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(33), 103-108. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP.

Beckman, W. S. (2008). Pre-testing as a method of conveying learning objectives. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 17(2), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.2008.1447

Evans, B. R. (2011). Content Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy in the Mathematics New York City Teaching Fellows (NYCTF). Program. School Science and Mathematics, 111(5), 225–235. doi:10.1111/j.1949- 8594.2011.00081.x

Gurses, A., Akyildiz. M., Dogar. C., & Sozbilir, M. (2007). An investigation of effectiveness of problem-based learning at physical chemistry laboratory. Research in Science and Technol Education, 25(2),99–111. doi:10.1080/02635140601053641.

Gurses, A., Dogar, C., & Geyik, E. (2015). Teaching of the Concept of Enthalpy Using Problem Based Learning Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2390–2394. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.298.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching (5th ed). New York: Allyn and Bacon.

Karpudewan, Treagust, Mocerino, Won, dan Chandrasegaran. (2015). Investigating High School Students’ Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium Concepts. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(6), 845-863.Retrieved from: http://www.ijese.net/arsiv/165

Okoye, K., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Understanding dependent and independent variables in research experiments and hypothesis testing. in: r programming. Springer, Singapore. 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3385-9_5

Philips, C.D., & Soltis, J.F. (2009). Perspectives on learning. London: Teacher College Press.

Ross, A., & Willson, V.L. (2017). Paired samples t-test. in: basic and advanced statistical tests. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8_4

Rusman. (2012). Model-model pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sendur, G., Toprak, M., & Pekmez, E.S. (2010). Analyzing of students‘ misconceptions About Chemical Equilibrium. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications. Retrieved from http://www.iconte.org/.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: an overview. Journal Of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2-20. Retrieved from http://www.tused.org.

Smith, M. , & Cook, K. (2012). Attendance and Achievement in Problem-based Learning: The Value of Scaffolding. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem- Based Learning, 6(1), 129-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541- 5015.1315

Tarhan, L., & Acar-Sesen, B. (2013). Problem based learning in acids and bases: learning achievements and students‘ beliefs. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 12(5). 565-578. Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/319.

Uden, L., dan Beaumont, C. 2006. Technology and problem-based learning. USA: Information Science Publishing

Vocational Instructional Materials Lab. (1998). Applied Mathematics: Targets for Learning Strategies for Preparing Successful Problem Solvers in the Workplace. Columbus: Ohio State University, 36-40

Wahyu, W., Kurnia., Syaadah, R.S. (2018). Implementation of problem-based learning (PBL) approach to improve student‘s academic achievement and creativity on the topic of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions at vocational school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1013 012096, 1- 8. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012096.